This morning, while facing the simple task of deleting a name and an e-address from my Contact List, I found it a far more painful chore than I was prepared for; the name was, Danita Kilcullen.
How does one say goodbye to a dear, dear friend while still fighting the reality of the cold fact that she is gone from our life? Since her Lord took her back home just a couple of weeks ago, I’ve been considering how to delete her name and e-mail from my list or even, whether to do it or not. I’ve had brief thoughts of leaving the name but highlighting it, somehow. I’ve pondered how to ‘keep her’ while letting her go. Both sad and silly at the same time. As I said, ‘This one hurt’.
Over the years and in dozens of venues, I’ve taken literally, thousands of photos of Danita, in all circumstances, under all conditions, in good times and in some not-so-good times. In happy moods, in joyous moments, in tender moments, in deadly serious moments and in all the entire gamut of emotional settings in between. My digital photo file holds the visual history of TPFTL (Tea Party Ft. Lauderdale) founded and run by Danita Kilcullen and Jack Gillies from the moment of its inception in February 2009 right up until the last meeting Danita conducted at Umberto’s on January 9, 2016, when she showed up wearing a back brace. She never gave any indication of the actual pain she was enduring while she was guiding the events at that meeting.
As I moved around the room, shooting my usual photo coverage of this event, I had no inkling that these would be the last photos I’d ever take of my dear friend, Danita.
If I were asked about a particular TPFTL event during the years that I shot all those photos, I wouldn’t need to refer to my photo files – it’s a good bet that I could describe almost every image I ever took of Danita. Anytime I focused my viewfinder on this lady, my camera was happy and so was I.
Open Letter to President Barack Hussein Obama, Gun Control Groups & The Entire U. S. Congress:
It will probably come as a shocking surprise to you, your senior advisors and your loyal, toady staffs, to learn of my considered assessment that you all fall into one of two categories – either you are in the ‘Slow-Learner Group’or the ‘You-Will-Never-Learn’Group.
You see Folks, there is already an over-abundance of so-called, ‘Gun Control’ laws on the books. This is of course, precisely due to your knee-jerk reaction to each new massacre of innocent human life by a group or an individual, that is invariably Islamist-inspired. You are programmed to dash madly into creating and pumping out yet another piece of useless, ineffective, unrealistic, impractical legislation that is aimed at adding ever more, ever tighter regulations to limit the availability of guns and ammo needed by the citizens of the United States to protect themselves from the effects of such restrictions being imposed upon them by their very own Government.
There is great concern expressed on your part, that each act of violence and mass murder, be described with creative terminology that fits the matrix of this Islam-friendly President. Which means that no act of extreme violence, regardless of the facts, is ever, ever,ever attributed directly to the ideology of Islam. While the perpetrators of these atrocities may have been directly or indirectly inspired by the Islamist lunatics of Iran, Syria, Saudi Arabia or any other of the dozens of Islamist-dominated states in the Middle East or Asia – no finger of blame must ever be pointed at the true source.
Hence, regardless of the source or the motivation, the automatic response is to credit the availability of guns here in the United States, as the ‘go-to’ cause of the problem. This is at the core of the insanity of Obama’s political correctness, personal cowardice and total enslavement to the concept of perpetual, passive inaction in the face of direct attacks upon our citizenry.
Well the RINOs, pseudo-conservatives, bho supporting democrats and Vile Anti-Constitution, gun grabbing Leftists must see that Ted Cruz is back! He was the only one standing up for “We The People” in Idaho against Big Corn (ethanol) and the Government Cronies. Well now he is standing up for Our Rights to protect ourselves from Terrorists, Thugs and what could be a Tyrannical Regime.
Listen and – or read how the Senator from the Great State of Texas, Ted Cruz, blasts these miscreants who are against the Second Amendment.
Senator Ted Cruz: The Administration’s Refusal to Confront Radical Islamic Terrorism Has Made America Less Safe
“Madam President, our nation is at war. Five days ago, we saw a horrific terror attack in Orlando, Florida. From 9/11 to the Boston Marathon, from Fort Hood to Chattanooga, from San Bernardino to this attack in Orlando, radical Islamic terrorism has declared jihad on America. As the facts have unfolded, it now indicates that the Orlando terrorist has pledged his allegiance to ISIS in the process of murdering 49 and wounding more than 50 at a nightclub.
“All of us, our hearts go out to those who were murdered, to the families of those who were victims and who are grieving. We stand in solidarity. We lift them up in prayer at this horrific act of terrorism.
“But it is also a time for action. We need a Commander-in-Chief who will speak the truth, who will address the enemy we face, who will unleash the full force and fury of the American military on defeating ISIS and defeating radical Islamic terrorists.
“In the wake of the attack, many of us predicted what would unfold, and it was sadly the same political tale we have seen over and over again. Many of us predicted that Democrats would, as a matter of rigid partisan ideology, refuse even to say the words ’radical Islamist terrorism;’ that they would suggest this attack was yet another isolated incident, one lone criminal not connected to any global ideology, not connected to any global jihad, and that even worse they would try to use it as an excuse to go after the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding citizens.
“Madam President, I wish when we predicted that that we had been proven incorrect, but this week played out all too predictably. Yesterday, we saw a political show on the Senate floor. Democrat after Democrat standing for hours incensed, not at ISIS, incensed, not at radical Islamic terrorism, incensed that Americans have a right to keep and bear arms. This is political distraction. This is political gamesmanship. And I think the American people find it ridiculous that in response to an ISIS terror attack, the Democrats go on high dungeon that we’ve got to restrict the second amendment rights of law-abiding citizens. This is not a gun control issue. This is a terrorism issue. And it is nothing less than political gamesmanship for them to try to shift for their favorite hobby horse of taking away the Bill of Rights from law-abiding citizens.
“I have spent years defending the Second Amendment, the right to keep and bear arms, the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, and I along with you, Madam President, along with a great many members of this chamber, are committed to defending the constitutional rights of every American. You don’t defeat terrorism by taking away our guns. You defeat terrorism by using our guns. And this body should not be engaged in a political circus trying to restrict the Second Amendment. Instead, we should be focusing on the problem at hand. Why did we see yesterday’s series of speeches? Because Senate Democrats have an election coming up in November. And they don’t want to talk about the real issue. Let’s talk about ISIS. Let’s talk about radical Islamic terrorism. Let’s talk about the failures of the last seven years of this Administration to keep this country safe.
“Now, in response to my criticism and that of many others, President Obama gave a press conference where he said, echoing the words of Hillary Clinton, ‘what difference does it make if we call it radical Islamic terrorism?’ Well, Mr. President, it makes a world of difference because the failure to address the enemy impacts every action taken to fight that enemy, and I want to talk in particular about three areas where this Administration and the Senate Democrats’ refusal to confront radical Islamic terrorism has made America less safe and what we need to do about it.
“Let’s start with prevention. Over and over again, we have seen the Obama administration having ample information to stop a terrorist attack, and yet because of the political correctness, because of the ideology of this administration that won’t even say the word ’jihad,’ won’t even say the words ’radical Islamic terrorism,’ they look the other way and the attacks go forward.
“In my home state of Texas, Fort Hood, Nidal Hasan, the Obama administration knew that Nidal Hasan had been in communication with a radical Islamic cleric, Anwar al-Awlaki. The Obama administration knew that Nidal Hasan had asked al-Awlaki about the permissibility of waging jihad against his fellow soldiers. All of that was known beforehand, and yet they did nothing. They did nothing, and on that fateful day, Nidal Hasan murdered 14 innocent souls, yelling ‘Allahu Akbar’ as he pulled the trigger. And yet, just to underscore the blindness of this administration, even after the terror attack, the administration insisted on characterizing that terror attack as ‘workplace violence.’ That is nothing short of delusion, and it’s a delusion that cost 14 lives. If we know of a U.S. service member who is communicating with a radical Islamic cleric and asking about waging jihad against his fellow soldiers, MPs should show up at that individual’s door within minutes. And if we didn’t have an administration that plunged its head in the sand like an ostrich and refused to acknowledge radical Islamic terrorism, Nidal Hasan would have been stopped before he carried out that horrific act of terrorism.
“Likewise, the Boston bombing: the Tsarnaev brothers. Russia had informed the Obama administration they were connected with radical Islamic terrorism. We knew that. The FBI had gone and interviewed them. And yet once again, they dropped the ball. They stopped monitoring them, so they didn’t even note when the elder Tsarnaev brother posted on YouTube a public call to jihad. Now, mind you, this was not requiring complicated surveillance. This was YouTube. Anyone with a computer who could type in Google could see this. And yet, because the administration will not acknowledge that we’re fighting radical Islamic terrorism, they were not watching and monitoring the Tsarnaev brothers; so when they called for public jihad, they then carried out that public jihad with pressure cookers at the Boston marathon. Yet another example where we knew about the individual beforehand, and if we had focused prevention on the problem, we could have stopped it.
“A third example was San Bernardino. San Bernardino, that horrific terror attack. Once again, we had ample information about the individuals in question. The female terrorist who came to San Bernardino had given the administration a fake address in Pakistan, and yet the so-called vetting that this administration tells us they do had failed to discover that it was a fake address. She had made calls for jihad, and yet the administration failed to discover that. In San Bernardino, we saw yet another horrific terror attack.
“And how about Orlando? Let’s talk about what the facts are in Orlando. Now, we’re only five days in. The facts will develop further as they’re more fully developed, but here is what’s been publicly reported. What’s been publicly reported is that Omar Mateen was interviewed not once, not twice but three times by the FBI in 2013 and 2014; that one of the reasons why he was interviewed by the FBI was because he was talking in his place of employment, which ironically, which shockingly enough, was a contractor to the Department of Homeland Security, and he was talking about being connected to terrorist organizations including the Boston bombers.
“Now, to any rational person, that is a big red flag. And yet it’s also been reported that his coworkers were afraid to say anything because they didn’t want to be labeled as somehow anti-Muslim by speaking out about someone claiming to be connected to radical Islamic terrorists. We also know that when he was questioned by the FBI in 2014, according to public reports, it was because he was believed to have been connected to Moner Mohammad Abusalha, who traveled to Syria to join the terrorist organization Al-Nusra Front, and who became the first known American suicide bomber in the Syrian conflict.
“Now that, Madam President, is yet another big red flag. If you’re palling around with Al-Nusra suicide bombers, that ought to be a real flag. If the administration is focused on radical Islamic terrorism, this is an individual we ought to be watching. We know that Mateen, as it’s been reported, traveled to Mecca in Saudi Arabia for ten days in March, 2011, and for eight days in March, 2012. And we also have indications that the FBI may have been aware that he was a follower of the Islamist educational web site run by a radical imam. And not only that, that his father had posted videos online expressing not only sympathy, but arguably support for the Taliban. All of that is what the Obama administration knew.
“And yet, by Sunday morning, they were no longer watching Omar Mateen. They were no longer watching Omar Mateen. They were not monitoring him, and he was able to go in and commit a horrific act of murder. The question that every member of this body should be asking is why is the ball being dropped over and over and over again? It’s not once, it’s not twice, it is a pattern. It is a pattern of failing to connect the dots, and I would suggest, Madam President, it is directly connected to President Obama and this administration’s refusal to acknowledge what it is we’re fighting. If you direct the prevention efforts to stopping radical Islamic terrorism, you know what? We had all the information we need on Mateen to keep a very close eye on him. And yet if that’s not what you’re fighting, then you close the investigation and yet another attack goes forward.
“I would suggest that this willful blindness is one of the reasons why we saw the circus yesterday on the Senate floor. Senate Democrats should be asking these questions, and yet we don’t hear them asking those questions. Instead, they want to shift this to gun control. They want to shift this to putting the federal government in charge of approving every firearms transaction between law-abiding citizens in America. Mind you, that would not have prevented this attack. Mind you, it was not directed at the evil of this attack. Mind you, it ignores the global jihad we’re facing, but it is a convenient political dodge. We need serious leadership focused on keeping this country safe.
“A second component of keeping this country safe that identifying the enemy would produce is defeating ISIS — utterly and completely defeating ISIS. In yesterday’s circus when calling for taking away your and my constitutional rights, how often did Senate Democrats say ’let’s utterly destroy ISIS?’ Not with the pinprick attacks we’re seeing, not with a photo op foreign policy of this administration, a failed effort that leaves the terrorists laughing at us, but instead using overwhelming air power, instead using the concerted power of the United States military with rules of engagement that allow us to fight and win.
“Madam President, right now we’re sending our service men and women into combat with rules of engagement tying their hands behind their backs, it is wrong, it is immoral and it’s not accomplishing the task. You want a response to the Orlando attack? President Obama and Vice President Biden will no doubt give a self-righteous speech about gun control trying to strip away the rights of law-abiding Americans. How about them standing up and having the President pledge that ISIS will be driven from the face of the Earth? You want to see a response to murdering innocent Americans? If you declare war on America, you’re signing your death warrant. That is the response of a Commander-in-Chief. That’s the seriousness we need.
“And a third component of focusing on the enemy is that we should focus on keeping us safe, and in particular, passing two pieces of legislation, both of which I’ve introduced — the first of which is the Expatriate Terrorist Act. This is legislation that provides that if any American citizen goes and takes up arms and joins ISIS, joins a radical Islamic terrorist group, that he or she forfeits their U.S. citizenship. So you do not have American citizens coming back to America with U.S. Passports to wage jihad on America.
“We’ve seen Americans like Jose Padilla, Anwar al-Awlaki, like Faisal Shazad, who have abandoned their country and gone and joined up with the terrorists in waging war against us. And just this week the CIA Director testified to the Senate that more are coming, that ISIS intends to send individuals back here to wage jihad.
“Rather than engaging in political showmanship, trying to gain partisan advantage in the November election, how about we come together and say if you join ISIS, you’re not using a U.S. Passport to come back here and murder American citizens. That ought to be a unanimous agreement if we were focused on keeping this country safe.
“And likewise, let’s talk about the problem of refugees. What are the consequences of the willful blindness of this administration? That President Obama, in the face of this terror attack, says that he will admit some 10,000 Syrian Muslim refugees, despite the fact that the FBI Director has told Congress he cannot possibly vet them to determine if they’re terrorists. Indeed here’s what FBI Director Comey said: ‘we can only query against that which we have collected. If someone has never made a ripple in the pond in Syria in a way we could get their identity or their interests reflected in our database, we can query our database until the cows come home, but there will be nothing to show up because we have no record of them.’ This is an FBI Director appointed by President Obama who is telling the administration they cannot vet these refugees, yet what does the administration say? What does Hillary Clinton say? Who do the Senate Democrats say? Let the refugees in even though ISIS is telling us they’re going to use those refugees to send terrorists here to come and murder us.
“This transcends mere partisan disagreement. This is lunacy. We know the Paris attack was carried out in part by people who came in using the refugee program, taking advantage of the refugee program. Indeed earlier this year, January 6, 2016, Omar Faraj Saeed Al Hardan, a Palestinian born in Iraq who entered the United States as a refugee in 2009, was charged with attempting to provide support to ISIS, and he wanted to set off bombs using cell phone detonators at two malls at my hometown of Houston, Texas. This is a refugee who came from Iraq, and yet do you hear the administration saying ‘this is a dangerous world. Jihadists are attempting to kill us. We have to keep us safe.’ They don’t say that.
“The legislation I’ve introduced which I would urge this body to take up would impose a three-year moratorium on refugees coming from any nation where ISIS or Al Qaeda or radical Islamic terrorists control a substantial portion of the territory. We can help with humanitarian efforts. We can help resettling refugees in the majority Muslim countries in the Middle East. America is a compassionate country that has given more than ten times as much money as any country on Earth to caring for refugees. But being compassionate doesn’t mean we’re suicidal. It doesn’t mean we invite to America, we invite to our homes, people who the FBI cannot tell us if they are terrorists or not.
“What should this Senate be doing? We shouldn’t be engaging in a sideshow of gun control. By the way, I will say on behalf of a lot of American citizens in the wake of this terror attack, it is offensive. I sat in that chair and presided yesterday over some of the show. It was offensive to see Democrat after Democrat prattling on about the NRA. It wasn’t the NRA who murdered 49 people in Orlando. It wasn’t the NRA who set up pressure cookers in the Boston bombing. It wasn’t the NRA who murdered 14 innocent souls at Fort Hood. And it is offensive to play political games with the constitutional rights of American citizens instead of getting serious about keeping this country safe.
“I would urge this body to take up both pieces of legislation, the Expatriate Terrorist Act, to prevent terrorists from using U.S. Passports to come back to America, and TRIPA, to prevent refugees from countries with majority control, major control from ISIS or Al Qaeda from coming in as ISIS terrorists as refugees. Those would be commonsense steps the overwhelming majority of Americans would agree with. And yet in this politicized environment, that is not what our friends on the other side of the aisle want to talk about. Until we get serious about defeating radical Islamic terrorism, we will continue to lose innocence.
“I would note one aspect of the attack on Sunday morning widely reported was that it was at a gay bar. And there are great many Democrats who are fond of calling themselves champions of the LGBT community. I would suggest there is no more important issue to champion in that regard than protecting Americans from murder by a vicious ideology that systematically murders homosexuals, that throws them off buildings, that buries them under rocks. The regime in Iran now supported by billions of dollars of American taxpayer dollars at the behest of President Obama murders homosexuals regularly.
“And I will confess some in the press pool were a little bit puzzled. Well, how could a Republican be speaking out against this? Let me be very clear, Madam President. I am against murder. I am against murder of any American, and nobody has a right to murder anybody because they differ in faith, because they differ in sexual orientation, because they differ in any respect. We’re a nation founded on protecting the rights of everyone to live according to their conscience, according to their faith, and this murder in Orlando was not random. It was part of a global jihad, an ideology, an Islamist ideology, that commands its adherence to murder or forcibly convert the infidels, by whom they mean every one of us.
“This body should not be engaged in political games. We should be focused on the threat and keeping America safe and defeating radical Islamic terrorism. And as we remember the victims of this latest terror attack, the greatest memorial we can give to them is to redouble ourselves to a seriousness of purpose to prevent the next terror attack from taking innocent American lives. I hope that’s what this body does. I hope we do so in a bipartisan manner. I yield the floor.”
You can see that this is why Texans sent Senator Cruz to Washington DC, to fight for our Rights. More People should have done their homework and seen this is the Guy that America needs as our Country is being attacked from within by Left Wing Thugs.
Another great writer mentioned something similar to this:
Hey RINOs, look at Ted Cruz, this is what a true Constitutional Conservative looks like. He is not attacking Americans for owning guns, he is not flip flopping, or flat out lying.
A Must See Video on Gun Control History and how many innocent people die after losing their Freedom.
The Orlando terror attack was by a scumbag gunman who ignored the gun-free designation put out by Liberals for the Pulse Nightclub. How many gay or straight or whatever people have to die at the hands of Islamo Nazi terrorists before all “The People” wake up. The disgusting Left Wingers immediately work to take the Second Amendment rights away from Legal citizens while the current Regime is importing Violent Terrorists with the so-called Moderate Muslims. Also look at all the thousands of Violent Illegal Aliens who were let out of prison and put back on the streets of America. The Regime and his Kool-Aid drinkers don’t want you to be able to protect yourself while these rapists and murderers and thieves are put on our streets.
Background Checks Do Not Stop High Profile Attackers–Although gun grabbers relentlessly push background checks as the solution to stopping high profile attacks on innocent Americans, the facts are that background checks do not hinder high profile attackers in the least. Alleged Orlando attacker Omar Mateen passed a background check for his guns, as did UCLA gunman Mainak Sarkar and almost every high profile attacker in the past 10 years.
Breitbart News has published a list of attackers and alleged attackers who passed background checks for their guns, and that list stands as evidence that background checks are no hindrance to evil persons dedicated to murder. The list includes: “Sayed Farook and Tashfeen Malik (San Bernardino), Noah Harpman (Colorado Springs), Chris Harper Mercer (Umpqua Community College), Vester Lee Flangan (Virgina), John Russell Houser (Lafayette), Muhammad Youssef Abdulazeez (Chattanooga), Dylann Roof (Charleston), Elton Simpson and Nadir Soofi (Garland), Jared and Amanda Miller (Las Vegas), Elliot Rodger (Santa Barabara), Ivan Lopez (Fort Hood 2014), Darion Marcus Aguilar (Maryland mall), Karl Halverson Pierson (Arapahoe High School), Paul Ciancia (LAX), Andrew John Engeldinger (Minneapolis), Aaron Alexis (DC Navy Yard), Tennis Melvin Maynard (West Virginia), Wade Michael Page (Sikh Temple), James Holmes (Aurora theater), Jared Loughner (Tucson), Nidal Hasan (Fort Hood 2009), Jiverly Wong (Binghamton), Seung-Hui Cho (Virginia Tech), Naveed Haq (Seattle), and Mark Barton (Atlanta).”
2. More People Killed With Clubs, Hammers Than Rifles–Amid the push for an “assault weapons” ban following the Sandy Hook attack, Breitbart News consulted FBI numbers for the years 2005-2011 and found that the number of murders by hammers and clubs constantly topped the number of murders by rifle. For example, In 2005 the number of murders committed with a rifle was 445, while the number of murders committed with hammers and clubs was 605. In 2006, the number of murders committed with a rifle was 438, while the number of murders committed with hammers and clubs was 618. In 2011, there was 323 murders committed with a rifle but 496 murders committed with hammers and clubs.
And it should be noted the rifles in view here include all kinds of rifles–bolt-actions, semiautomatic hunting rifles, semiautomatic target rifles, etc.–so the percentage of deaths in which a rifles like an AR-15 were used would be even smaller than the overall number quoted for the years above.
3. AR-15s Are Not “Automatic” Rifles–Although politicians like Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders, celebrities like Seth MacFarlene, and too many media pundits to number have referred to the AR-15 as an “automatic” weapon during last few months, the fact remains that AR-15s are semiautomatic firearms. They shoot one round–and only one round–each time the trigger is pulled. This means an AR-15 shoots no faster than a Smith & Wesson M&P 9mm handgun, or a Glock or Sig Sauer .40 caliber handgun, or an H&K or Ruger .45 caliber handgun. Claims to the contrary are either based on ignorance or are part of a focused attempt to demonize the AR-15.
4. Guns Are Legally Used For Self-Defense Purposes Approximately 760,000 A Year–Staggering isn’t it? Especially when you consider the way the mainstream media covers gun crime after gun crime, giving the impression that guns are just bad things which bad people use to hurt good people. Yet Florida State University criminologist Gary Kleck has demonstrated that guns are used for defensive purposes approximately 760,000 a year in the United States.
5. Gun-Free Zones Are Killing Fields–The Orlando terror attack to place in gun-free zone. Result? Approximately 50 are dead! The attack in the Umpqua Community College gun-free zone (October 2015) left 9 dead, the attack on the gun-free Chattanooga military offices (July 2015) left five dead, the attack in Fort Hood’s gun-free zone (April 2014) left 3 dead, the earlier attack in Fort Hood’s gun-free zone (November 2009) killed 13, the attack in the gun-free DC Navy Yard (September 2013) killed 12, the attack on gun-free Sandy Hook Elementary (December 2012) killed 26, the attack in the gun-free Aurora movie theater (July 2012) killed 12, and the attack on the gun-free Virginia Tech campus (April 2007) killed 32. Think about it–Eight gun-free zones, 207 firearm-related deaths.
6. More Children Under 10 Killed By Fire, Drowning Than Accidental Gun Deaths—Breitbart News previously reported Centers for Disease Control and Prevention numbers for 2010. The figures were compiled by John Lott, they showed the number of children under the age of 10 unintentionally killed in fire-related deaths was over seven times higher than the number of children killed in unintentional gun-related deaths, and the number of children killed in unintentional drowning deaths was sixteen times higher than the number of children killed in unintentional gun-related deaths. The raw numbers were as follows: Number of children killed in unintentional fire-related deaths was 262, the number of unintentional drowning 609, the number of accidental gun-related deaths was 36.
They are like fraternal twins. They think alike.They stink alike.
They both share a morbid fear of our free-enterprise system thus, they both disdain it. Neither can abide a nation that thrives in Liberty. They despise our Constitution that guarantees us our very own personal freedoms. Things can only be right in their world when they are able to operate with the advantage of a playing field that is slanted in their favor. They only feel safe when they are in total control of every aspect of the lives, futures and fortunes of others. They need to hold all the marbles otherwise, they dare not play the game. Neither is a team player. They only know to cheat.
They are both radical ideologues. Her thing is money; his thing is Islam. They are both unmitigated, congenital liars. Neither of them can fathom doing things according to the established laws of this nation; being straight forward in dealings with others is to them, an anathema, something to be avoided at all costs. They are both closet gays. They both delude themselves into thinking they are truly sincere. They share the dominant gene that propels them toward corruption as their go-to modus operandi. Neither has accomplished one thing of positive value to Society during their entire existence on this Earth. Both have indelibly stained this nation’s political landscape beyond reclamation. They stink!
Notes: This Video has been taken down a few times by Liberals against America.
The Prime Minister Of Israel Reacts To Orlando Shooting
From Benjamin Netanyahu:
In Orlando, a terrorist walks into a nightclub and murders nearly 50 human beings. Sons and daughters, brothers and sisters cut down in cold blood.
They did nothing wrong. They were dancing with friends, they were enjoying music with loved ones.
Why did the terrorist murder them?
Because he was driven by a fanatical hatred.
He targeted the LGBT community because he believed they were evil.
Now, the murderer wasn’t alone.
Regimes and terrorist organizations around the world ruthlessly persecute the LGBT community.
In Syria, ISIS throws gays off rooftops.
In Iran, the regime hangs gays from cranes.
Too many people have remained silent in the face of this awful persecution.
This week’s shooting wasn’t merely an attack on the LGBT community. It was an attack on all of us, on our common values of freedom and diversity and choice.
Radical Islamist terror makes no distinction between shades of infidel.
This week it was gays in Orlando. A few days before that it was Jews in Tel Aviv. Before that it was music fans in Paris; Travelers in Brussels; Yazidis in Iraq; Community workers in San Bernardino; Christians and journalists in Syria.
All of us are targets.
We believe that all people are created in the image of God.
ISIS, by contrast, believes that all people who aren’t just like them deserve to die.
We will not be terrified into submission.
We will fight back. And we will triumph.
Today I ask you to reach out to friends in the LGBT community. Comfort them.
Tell them you stand together, we stand together as one. And that you will always remember the victims.
Tell them they will never be alone, that we are all one family deserving of dignity, deserving of life.
I have no doubt that those who seek to spread hate and fear will be defeated.
Working together we will defeat them even faster.
We need to stand united, resolute in the belief that all people regardless of their sexual orientation, regardless of their race, regardless of their ethnicity, all people deserve respect, deserve dignity.
Our Muslim President spews a full load of Taqiyya;
Our Muslim Director of the CIA utters the Truth.
Both Muslims:ALL WRONG ALL THE TIME!
First: Let’s refer to the recent Sunday program on FOX in which Chris Wallace played at interviewing Barack Hussein Obama in their first-ever ‘interview’. Chris ostensibly posed tough questions to Obama who, although he was there in person, might as well have phoned-in his rehearsed, prepared answers with no surprises. But then, with no truth, either. Obama didn’t believe a single word of what he said during that session. How can I state that as fact? Because whenever he plays at being a sincere American President with the interest of the American people as his first concern, he lies. He has proven that time and time again. He is a congenital liar who is physiologically incapable of telling the truth; he is sworn to destroy our nation, our Constitution and our will to resist Islam. So much for FOXs ‘fair & balanced’ interview. The interview was a sham; totally worthless or worse.
Next: In a recent news briefing, CIA Director, John O. Brennan stated for the record: “CIA won’t waterboard again – even if ordered by a future president.” That seems clear enough, even though it was an extremely stupid thing to say when coming from the head of the nation’s top secret agency. Simple logic tells us that a man in this position of trust should have the rudimentary common sense to keep his mouth shut about such matters as, how we go about interrogating our sworn enemies. Apparently, this man hasn’t the slightest concern with stating this actual truth. He wears a Teflon coat.
The fact that years ago when he was CIA station head in Saudi Arabia, he saw fit to convert to Islam, seems to give him license and makes him feel comfy to say anything that pops into his head, regardless of how inappropriate it is in terms of our national security. Can you imagine Winston Churchill making such a gaffe?
There you have it Folks. Two Muslims: ALL WRONG ALL THE TIME!
What happened to America in the 2012 Election may best be summed up by this new word:
"Ineptocracy” (in-ep-toc-ra-cy) - a system of government where the least capable to lead are elected by the least capable of producing, and where the members of society least likely to sustain themselves or succeed, are rewarded with goods and services paid for by the confiscated wealth of a diminishing number of producers.
On Monday's New Day, after a discussion of the possibility that some Britons may have buyers' remorse after the Brexit vote to end EU membership and how the issue plays into the U.S. presidential election, CNN political commentator Errol Louis claimed that Republicans have been on a trend of candidates making "more extreme" promises that […]
Apparently nothing is beneath the snark and clownery of Deadspin. On Monday, Deadspin writer Tom Ley posted an article that referenced an incident involving an airplane, a near-death situation, prayer, and Tim Tebow. What could go wrong?
Just often enough to catch your attention, loose-cannon lefty comic Bill Maher demonstrates why conservatives still remain in his audience. One of the guests on his HBO show Friday night, veteran Clinton apologist/Democrat consultant Paul Begala made a claim about Republicans so insipid that Maher -- who enjoys nothing more than bashing the GOP -- […]
Monday on Andrea Mitchell Reports, the host salivated over the “magic on stage” at the Clinton/Warren rally Cincinnati earlier in the day. Mitchell and Anita Dunn, former White House communications director, went back and forth as they praised the pair for their “very real” chemistry on stage. They went on and on, suggesting the women […]
New on June 27: HBO’s Bill Maher used the Brexit vote to call for a “re-write” of the U.S. Constitution. Admiring the British acceptance of Brexit, Maher complained about the House not voting on gun control: “We can't even get a vote on something that 90 percent of Americans agree on and can’t get a […]
Remember when the left passionately insisted that public schools distribute free condoms to students on the bizarre theory that they were going to have sex anyway and we might as well make it safe? Well, the results are in, and the left isn't looking too great.
Democracy is all well and good, until the outcome of a popular vote is unpopular with the liberal media. The people of the United Kingdom voted on June 23, to leave the European Union. The broadcast news programs tried their own veto, focusing heavily on voter “Bregret” and anger in the three nights following the […]
Univision's fawning coverage of the Supreme court's ruling in Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt shows the extent to which the network is both out of touch with its viewership and biased towards a progressive agenda.
Writing on The Washington Post’s Wonkblog early Monday morning, writer Emily Badger bemoaned the June 23 vote by the United Kingdom (U.K.) to leave the European Union (E.U.) as an example of a bad referendum because it gave voters power to decide something that involved “thorny debates we elect government officials to hash out.”
Health Reform: The health care law President Obama signed six years ago was supposed to fix the individual insurance market with enlightened rules and regulations. Instead, ObamaCare is destroying this market. Just look at what's happening to Blue Cross Blue Shield. If any insurer could cope with ObamaCare, it should have been Blue Cross BlueContinued
Freedom: Hillary Clinton and other leaders in her party always talk about how they want to grant new rights to Americans. They talk about the "right to affordable health care," the "right to a college education," the "right to a livable wage." But at the same time, many of these same Democrats have been agitating toContinued
War on Terror: What's the best way to fight terrorism? If you're Attorney General Loretta Lynch, the correct answer is "love." So it's official: Americans should abandon any pretense that we're being protected by our government from the terrorists who would murder us. No, we're not making this up. Speaking recently about the June 12 attackContinued
Rule Of Law: An "equally divided" U.S. Supreme Court affirmed a lower court ruling that said President Obama exceeded his authority with his executive amnesty for illegal aliens. It's an important victory for the rule of law and separation of powers. Acting more like a dictator than an elected official, Obama had decreed that 4.3Continued
Election 2016: If you want to know how bankrupt the Democratic Party is today of pro-growth ideas, check out Hillary Clinton's latest speech on the economy. She has absolutely nothing new to offer that President Obama hasn't already tried. Clinton admits in her speech that things aren't all they should be in the economy afterContinued
Election 2016: During the presidential primaries Donald Trump loved to brag about how his 1987 book was the "best-selling business book of all time." Maybe he should take the time to reread it, since his presidential campaign is violating much of the advice Trump offered in that book. In "The Art of the Deal," TrumpContinued